2008-05-22
The Bulletin - Dowtown
His dying image was spread across front pages of newspapers and television screens worldwide, making Mohammed al-Dura the poster boy for Israeli brutality and Palestinian victimhood. But what if the footage distributed so fervently by
As an interested party, keen to support my firm belief that an Israeli soldier wouldn't simply shoot and kill a defenceless little boy for the hell of it, I followed the issue further. I read about ballistics reports, an IDF investigation and the like, checked out the map of the location which proved that he physically couldn't have been killed by an Israeli.
What struck me at the time was, why, in the middle of a violent riot plagued by gunfire, would anyone focus on shooting someone who was not in the middle of the action? Surely an Israeli soldier, coming under heavy gunfire would shoot at those firing the weapons, or at least in their direction. It simply doesn't make sense that, in the face of death, anyone would choose to focus on shooting someone in a way that appears more to be sport than warfare.
As the intifada continued, I discovered the Pallywood phenomenon a veritable industry where scenes are staged to portray
However, there is a major difference between me, a self-declared interested party, and the billions of people who witnessed the apparent murder of al-Dura: I continued to follow the story. And sadly, maybe that explains why he was martyred in the first place. Is it the case that a young boy was presumed to be worth sacrificing in order to score a moral point against Israel by uniting the world's population in disgust at the apparently brutal killing, and inciting Muslims to join the cause? Well, if this was the strategy, it worked. Al-Duras death came at the start of what become the 2nd Intifada, and thousands of people have lost their lives in the ensuing violence.
Why is this relevant now? Well, the French Court of Appeals has overturned a lower court decision that Jewish activist Philippe
The general public was shown 55 seconds of footage. The French court was shown 18 minutes and there are claims that there is more that is being kept out of the public eye. If
If it has taken eight years for 18 minutes to be shown, I don't imagine that we will ever know who actually shot the boy. And, anyway, would it really make a difference anyway if the truth were to come out? The damage to
Michelle Moshelian Hana Senesh
Givatayim (Israel)
© The Bulletin - Dowtown Toronto
Mis en ligne le 23 mai 2008, par M.











