21/05/08
Sur le site de Haaretz
The disturbing images of al-Dura and his father, crouching in front of a wall amid an exchange of fire between Israeli forces and Palestinian militants at the Netzarim junction in
In November 2004, Phillipe Karsenty wrote on his Web site Media Ratings that al-Dura's death had been staged, and accused Enderlin, who was not on location during the clashes, of using images doctored by his Palestinian cameraman Talal Abu Rahma for propaganda purposes.
The French station sued Karsenty and won. However, Karsenty appealed the decision. During this second trial, in the 11th chamber of the
In a February 2005 hearing, Karsenty said the footage showed the boy still moving his arm, even though the cameraman had said he was dead. He provided a report from a French ballistics expert indicating the shots fired past the al-Duras came from the Palestinian position, and he pointed out that several scenes before the al-Dura incident appeared staged.
The judge agreed in that hearing that some scenes did not seem genuine.
However, Enderlin said that the images were no different from the clashes he had witnessed repeatedly. The prosecution stated that a dead Palestinian boy had been buried after the Netzarim junction incident, and that Jamal al-Dura consented to DNA tests that could prove the boy was his son.
"This is the victory of truth against the lies broadcasted by
Speaking to reporters in the courthouse, Karsenty called on
"
Karsenty told Haaretz that the fact that











